Chelsea Invincibles? Jose's shot at Immortality

A Shot at Immortality

We are only 11 games into the season but the talk of ‘Chelsea Invincibles’ just refuses to go away. Admittedly, the press is the source of most the noise with betting websites like Paddy Power instigating matters by paying out on Chelsea to win the premier league. All this hype and the drama raises one serious question: can Chelsea actually do it?

The season is 38 games long. We are not even 30% through the season but for objective reason let’s look at the crucial data pragmatically. Chelsea’s closest rivals are Manchester City. Due respect to Southampton but it would be a legendary tale if the Saints keep up this form until the end of the season. So Chelsea have gone to their closest rivals and come away with a hard-fought draw. What could the other tricky fixtures be? Anfield, Goodison Park and for all their struggles, Old Trafford. Been there, still shining. So the first issue of the so called ‘tough fixtures’ is out of the way.

The second is how the team and more specifically the injury situation holds up. Any great team needs strength in depth. You cannot overstate the need for a deep squad that can bail you out of an injury crisis. Do Chelsea have an injury fool-proof squad? Sadly, no. But neither do Real Madrid in certain positions. Chicharito, for instance, is no replacement for Karim Benzema. Likewise, Loic Remy is no replacement for Diego Costa if, say, Costa is injured for a prolonged period which he has shown symptoms of. But the two positions Chelsea cannot afford to have injuries in are the CDMs. Nemanja Matic and Cesc Fabregas are virtually irreplaceable at Chelsea. If you consider the replacements, John Obi Mikel and Ramires, they are of a vastly inferior quality due to the form the aforementioned players are in. A serious injury to Fabregas and the team would lose its brain. Injuries are a major factor and ultimately may prove to be the deciding factor.

Thirdly is the often ignored factor of ‘mentality’. A football player is only as good as he believes he is. Similarly, a football team fuels itself on team spirit. Chelsea lost it near the end of last season and more so against the smaller teams. This season they have shown no cracks but they have been conceding a lot of late goals and goals from winning positions. In fact the two draws away to the Manchester Teams were both a result of late goals and both games ended 1-1. If you want to go the whole season unbeaten, you need to show killer instinct and close games down. At 1-0 you should be thinking about dominating possession and making it 2-0, not being tentative and dropping deep defensively, something Chelsea have been guilty of. If Chelsea can keep focus and  if Mourinho doesn’t let them lose perspective, it’ll be another box ticked.

Fourthly, you cannot ignore the number of competitions Chelsea have entered. Balancing a league cup midweek with a monster premier league game on Sunday evening and then playing at Nou Camp on Tuesday is a real possibility. You’ll need every player to show up. You simply cannot afford any passengers. Most of this is down to Mourinho. How he tinkers with the squad will have a huge effect on the outcome before and more specifically towards the business end of the tournament.

All in all, there is a fair chance that Chelsea can go undefeated. You get the feeling that Chelsea haven’t yet hit peak form. They are bound to do so at some point during the season and the thought itself is scary.  Having said that, they could just lose to West Brom this evening if they are not careful enough! Such is the premier league these days. You simply cannot take anyone for granted. Rest assured, Mourinho will have the boys in blue rooted to the ground. You cannot go to sleep when you play at this level. Although the manager’s target is to win ‘the next game’, I am sure a short at immortality would be brewing at the back of Jose’s mind. And if he can indeed go unbeaten this season, in this competitive climate, that is what it will be – immortality.

The Cautious Horse

Chelsea are undefeated this season in all competitions. In the league they have won all but two of their matches, against the two Manchester clubs and both those matches were played away from home. Things don’t look so bad at the moment eh? However volatile the league table may look currently, the toughest test Chelsea faced so far this season were these two matches. And the score line was the same. 1-1. Go one step further and chip in the Champions league results too. Two victories, one draw so far. Score? 1-1.

Chelsea's 'Little Horse' is all grown up but is cautious around the big boys.

Now if there ever was such a result as a ‘good draw’ for a top team like Chelsea it would have to be a hard fought 0-0 against an equally strong opposition. The second best would be 1-1. No need to panic. Time to move on. Except, there is a trend in all three matches and it is somewhat disturbing. Chelsea were leading in all three, only to go on to relinquish the lead, and somewhat tragically in the last minute against Manchester United last night. The question is, were the matches winnable? One was at home to a German team in crisis. The other was against a Manchester City side that was down to 10. The third against a team that was taken to the dead by Leicester City. No disrespect to either.

The thing is, Chelsea isn’t a ‘little horse’ anymore. Outside of Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Barcelona and perhaps Manchester City, Chelsea have the most complete squad in Europe at the moment. There is no need to be defending a 1-0 lead from the 60^th minute against Manchester United, whose defence has been woeful. Chelsea looked content with a 1-0 score line against 10 men at the Etihad. It shows too much respect to the opposition. And Jose Mourinho will perhaps be thinking the same. You only need to look at the games City and United have lost this season to get a full understanding of what could have been for Chelsea. Manchester United haven’t been coping well against counterattacking oppositions. City have struggled against the likes of West Ham who have upped their game and are actually playing very good football. And if you consider Schalke, well, they have been a tragedy this season.

Mourinho has been using John Obi Mikel as a 3-point insurance policy. While it makes tactical sense to do so, should he really be brought on to facilitate a 1-0 lead with over one-third of the game still to play? Against Manchester United there was absolutely no threat after Drogba scored the wonderful header. The devils had their backs against the wall and were there for the taking. But Mikel’s addition changed the winning formula for the worse by inviting unnecessary pressure from a world class attack. Oscar’s withdrawal meant that Chelsea’s attacking impetus was lost. They defended deep and paid the price. Imagine if such a thing happened in the Champions League knockouts this season. It did last season against Atletico Madrid when Chelsea decided to defend a 1-0 lead at home. But let bygones be bygone.

This season has only just begun. With only a quarter of the season gone, Chelsea sit at the top with 22 points, 4 ahead of second place Southampton. If Chelsea reproduce the same numbers in the next 3 quarters, they’ll end the season undefeated with 88 points, perhaps clinching the Premier League title along the way. However, it may be a slight underachievement considering what Jose Mourinho’s new-look Chelsea are capable of. With a little more self-belief and aggression it could easily have been a 100% record in all competitions. The season is long and full of twists. For it to be successful you need to grab what is in front of you and some. On the whole, Mourinho would look back and think he let 4 points slip through his fingers. And why wouldn't he? His stallion could have galloped out of sight if only for a few whips of encouragement.

Manchester United - The New Formation

Few days ago I blogged about what formation Barcelona should use this season to maximise their potential given the players they have. I ended up a with a 3-4-1-2, deduced from the brilliant system Louis van Gaal used with The Netherlands for virtually the whole world cup, regardless of the opponent. And it worked! As a result, the Dutch squad overachieved and van Gaal was already drawing dreamy glances from Old Trafford.

Manchester United find themselves in a precarious situation now. After the legendary reign of Lord Moyes, they are out of the Champions League and face an uphill task to reorganise their squad in order to challenge domestically and crawl back into the coveted top-4. Ironically their performance off the pitch during the same period in the sponsors’ market has been blockbuster. And that only adds a further weight of expectations on the coach and the players after the fine mugging job pulled off by Woodward.

Chief among the on-field problems for the club is the major issue of reorganisation of personnel and how to setup the team. Should he continue with the same formation of yesteryears or is it better to change to the brilliant 3-4-1-2 he engineered to perfection with his country?

Pivotal to answering that are three key points:

1.     Two of United’s three best players, Robin van Persie and Wayne Rooney, are world class strikers and must be played simultaneously and as such.

2.     The third amigo, Juan Mata, should be played in the hole.

3.     The team needs restructuring at the back and in midfield.

Wayne Rooney is a phenomenal player. Although he hasn’t done any justice to the ‘White Pele’ title that was brandished on him, he has contributed significantly at least at club level, scoring 17 and assisting 10 goals in the league last season - from midfield. That’s right. The farce of playing Rooney in the ‘number 10’ role despite the number on his back must end. It’s a travesty that it has gone on so long. While wise old coaches who have infinite times more knowledge than this amateur blogger have played him there, in my opinion Rooney is a natural striker and that’s what Mourinho was going on about when he attempted to lure him to Chelsea last season. Football is a game of opinions and everyone has a different interpretations of things. Mine is that United would benefit if Rooney is paired with van Persie upfront.

Juan Mata is a curious little fellow. If ever there was a player that demonstrated what being played in the right position can do to a player’s confidence and performance, it is him. In my humble opinion, Manchester United should build their team around Mata. He’s younger and will possibly hit greater heights than the two strikers in front of him. Juan Mata has statistics to stake his claim. At Chelsea he scored 12 and 20 goals respectively in his two full season and assisted at least three dozen per campaign. He won the best player award at Chelsea both times. All, from that ‘number 10’ position. His position on the field must not be up for debate. In his natural habitat he is worth 50 million Pounds. Elsewhere, probably 15.

Elsewhere, in midfield and defence, it is a different story. At the time of writing this article, it has been long confirmed that Man Utd have signed Andre Herrera and the arrival of Nigel de Jong looks very much on the cards. If they sign de Jong, with those two the team would have added two very good players who would be starting week after week. That leaves only the defence with much sorting out to do as they already have one of the best young goalkeepers guarding the net.

Having added the 19 year old Luke Shaw to the ranks, Man Utd have taken a small step in the right direction but their centre-back conquest needs to take shape soon if they want to avoid further embarrassment. Strengthening in that area is a must for Manchester United. While I understand that it is not a case of fantasy football, the three best options for the CB position currently are Mats Hummels, Mehdi Benatia and Raphael Varane. Depending on availability and other factors, the club should go all-in to get at least one of the three elite players.

Turning my attention back to the principle subject of this write-up, if van Gaal indeed decides to play 3 at the back, as he himself suggested he would, this is what the current team without the possible ins and outs might look like.

‘The beauty of playing with three centre-backs complimented by wing-backs on either side is that the team can easily switch from a 3 unit defence to a 5 unit defence without major alteration.’

This squad ticks ‘almost’ all the boxes in my opinion. There is quality, industry, and most importantly, balance. It is filled with tireless players who are known to put in a defensive shift whenever required. To some extent, however, it lacks one of Man Utd’s trademark characteristic: pace. As I said, this is a preview with only those players that United have on their books at the moment. They have announced their intent and capacity to add to the squad. With the funds available, trust van Gaal to add to his cast before he prepares to dazzle at the Theatre of Dreams.

Three At The Back for the Catalans (Barcelona: 3-4-1-2)

In reference to the article published on goal.com, a quasi-satire-football-website, apparently there is a bit of fantasy in store for all football fans. It seems Barcelona are going to play a bizarre 3-2-3-2 formation this season. Well you could argue that the rate at which the Catalan club is spiraling out of control these days, nothing can be put beyond them.

http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2014/08/04/5002476/messi-suarez-neymar-cuadrado-in-one-team-barcelonas-plans?ICID=HP_HN_1

The rumour however, like all rumours during the summer break, must and should be taken with a pinch of salt. The Cules are notoriously loyal to the 4-3-3 formation; a system they preach at every level of their famed La Masia academy. According to Johan Cruyff, the best Euporean footballer of all time and the brains behind the modern version of the academy, this consistency gives a standardised solution to the team and the players in the long run. There is no use arguing with that. Partly because Cruyff will never stand down and largely because there is every semblance of truth behind the claim. 4-3-3 is a mainstay and the most basic modern formation. It is the first sketch to a plethora of other contemporary formations like 4-2-3-1, 4-3-2-1 etc.

At Barcelona, although the 4-3-3- is a holy sermon, there have been occasions when a 3-4-3 has been used, most famously by Pep Guardiola. But the formation didn’t lead to much success and the team reverted to the ever-reliable 4-3-3. But soon enough, the tika-taka code was cracked by ultra-defensive teams that attack on the break. And ever since this ‘invincible’ tika-taka tactic was compromised, technical teams that set up defensively (see Chelsea) have challenged it and often emerged victorious. Atletico did it last year and the year before, Bayern (counter-attacking) truly demolished Barcelona in the Champions League semi-final with an aggregate score of 7-0 over two legs.

There is always a natural cycle and all things, good or bad, come to an end. Such prophetic wisdom would discourage you from blaming any specific reason for the demise of things but academically looking at it, one of the main reason for the downfall of tika-taka at Barcelona is perhaps the reluctance of full-backs doing their primary job – defend. It is no coincidence that Barcelona were a force to reckon with when the more defensive minded Eric Abidal was hugging the left touch line and the younger Dani Alves on the right actually read team hand-outs. Now, Jordi Alba thinks his main competitor is Cristiano Ronaldo and the older Dani seems convinced it would be cool to go out with a few hattricks under his belt.

In essence, what that means is that both Jordi Alba and Dani Alves have evolved into wing-backs. And if given a chance to produce in that capacity, there is little doubt if they would. However, in its purest form, the suggested 3-2-3-2 is a truly ridiculous formation and one that can never work. It looks and sounds like fantasy football which has no regard for balance across the pitch, narrowing down the game to a suffocating level.

Take a look at the deployment of personnel suggested in the goal article.

(Courtesy, source goal.com) 

The ground rule for any team that wants to play with 3 defenders at the back is they need to be complimented by wing-backs who are willing to run themselves to the ground. Without that physical presence on the wings, it’ll be very easy to get in behind the defence because the 3 defenders would naturally be playing close to one another. Let’s not forget most of the top teams at the World Cup played with three men at the back and it proved very effective. Chile even managed to stick in a 5’7” Gary Medel into the back 3!

Barca certainly have the players required to play a 3-man defence system. In fact, one could even argue that the way things stand, they are more suitable to it than they are to a 4-man defence. Gerard Pique has been hugely criticised of late and with the performances he has been putting in, little surprise there. His positioning has been suspect and his concentration has been dwindling. Without a leader like Puyol besides him, he is a fish out of water and totally out of depth. However, no one can doubt his ability on the ball. So, if Pique plays in the middle of the three-man defence as a 'sweeper' carrying the ball forward, starting attacks, his ability will count double.

(Three man defence)

On either side of Pique will be Jeremy Mathieu and Javier Mascherano who will add experience and bite to the unit respectively. Mathieu who is also surprisingly fast at the age of 30 can dictate terms from the back and Mascherano who is one of the best reader of the game in football would be phenomenal in this setup.

(Four-man midfield with wing-backs)

The four-man midfield is a no brainer with Alba on the left, Dani Alves on the right operating as wing-backs and new boy Ivan Rakitic joined by Sergio Busquets in the midfield pivot.

(Three man attack in a 1-2 formation)

Up-front is where the four best players at Barcelona will fight for the three spots. Well, technically the three best will fight for two spots in the 1-2 formation. Lionel Messi is a given on the right-hand side of the front two. On the left could be Luis Suarez or Neymar. The 1 could be either Iniesta or Neymar. Any of the three can operate there if Iniesta is unavailable. It’s a beautiful problem for Barcelona to have.

This is what the final team in a 3-4-1-2 formation would look like.

It is difficult to argue against the overall quality of this squad. This is the same system Louis van Gaal used at the world cup with The Netherlands and it produced tremendous results for the Dutch. The 3-2-3-2 was obviously a troll by goal.com. But a three-man defence would usher a new revolution at Barcelona and 3-4-1-2 seems just the right way to play it.

The Deal That Suits Everyone

The Departure of Romelu Lukaku

So after a prolonged will-it won’t-it transfer saga, Romelu Lukaku is finally a £28 million Everton player. As I had referred to a possible transfer in my previous blog (http://footballhotspotblog.blogspot.in/) on Jose Mourinho’s clever transfer dealings at Chelsea over the last two transfer windows, Lukaku’s sale takes their net transfer outlay over the last two windows to £19.5 million in the green. Not bad for a buying club eh? But what does Lukaku’s departure mean to the three stake holders? Could it be a case win-win-win?

Many are arguing that Chelsea were forced into the Lukaku sale. But there appear to be two versions of the story. Lukaku’s version, “I didn't want to spend 10 years on the bench” (source: London Evening Standard, 31^st July) and Mourinho’s version “he (Lukaku) was not highly motivated to come to a competitive situation at Chelsea” (source ESPN, 31^st July). With the differently abled Fernando Torres, pensioner Didier Drogba and untested maverick Patrick Bamford on the bench, surely Chelsea could have tossed Big Rom some important games. It only leads you to believe that for all his talent, Chelsea didn’t believe Lukaku to be worth more than what he was sold for. But a closer examination reveals that, oddly enough, things are looking good for everyone involved.

From Everton’s point of view, they have a marquee signing who is more likely to raise his fee than the other way around. It’s hard to see them make a loss on their club record signing. By the look of things, Fellaini paid for Lukaku. And that’s good for the Merseyside club because the afro-haired compatriot has not faired too well since. Everton are serious about their ambitions. They got their best players, Barkley and Baines, to stay and the best players on loan at their club last season, Lukaku and Barry, to join them permanently. Either spend paltry sums on players like Vellios, who are good stand-ins but don’t add much value, or make statement signings who will not only add great value to the squad but would sell for a profit later on if required. Smart move by the toffees.

From the Lukaku corner, things couldn’t be clearer. He is still only 21 and has many years to improve. If he is willing to learn and stay humble, which he clearly had problems doing, sky is the limit for the big man. If his loan spells are anything to go by, the lad can play. On the other hand, while Lukaku’s confidence in his own ability is encouraging to see, his morbid fear of competition is sure to raise a few eyebrows. Big fish in a small pond syndrome? While that is very disrespectful to Everton, it smells of that from Lukaku. This season is pivotal for the Belgian. He will either add a couple of million or shed a few pounds. A 20+ goal tally in the league will have suitors lining up and there is no reason why shouldn’t get there, now that he has an environment that he desperately craved.

For Chelsea, it looks like it could turn out to be a Sturridge situation in the long run (who they sold in January, 2013 for £12 million and who has since more than doubled his value) but there is a lot of sense to be made which doesn’t immediately catch the eye. The Sturridge comparisons are justified. Similar age, similar potential, similar position, both had hugely rewarding loan spells and Chelsea made a profit on both of them. But they are players of two very different profiles. From a tactical and financial point of view, the Sturridge sale was an A-grade disaster. Chelsea’s trio of attacking midfielders force the opposition to recede which means you need a striker who can work in tight spaces. Sturridge is that man. Lukaku however, is not. Not yet, anyway. He didn’t fit their immediate need. So what did they do? Moved him on and bough Diego Costa for a slightly larger amount. In effect, Lukaku paid for Costa who is the man they needed. So they will give the Belgian a ‘Thank You’ letter on his way out.

However it doesn’t end there for Chelsea despite Mourinho’s desperate attempts to underplay any further activity in the transfer window. “We finished the market today," said Mourinho. "The transfer market closes (on) 31 August and we close on July 19” (source: BBC, July 19^th). With a profit of almost £20 in his pocket and a possibility of offloading more players, only a naïve person would take Mourinho for his word.

Chelsea fans and the football world at large could be in for a surprise. Thanks to players like Lukaku who were, after all, a surplus to requirements.

You Old Fox, Jose

While the rest of the football loving fraternity had been enchanted, seduced and absorbed by the memorable world cup this summer, the old fox Jose Mourinho was up to some cunning business. How is that news you ask? Well, this time he has surpassed even his own lofty standards. In fact, what Jose Mourinho has achieved this time is unprecedented and will reverberate for years to come. Simply put, he has dismantled, rearranged, refurbished and rebuilt his Chelsea squad not just in record time but while hardly spending a penny in the process. To top it all off, he has made the intimidating task of rebuilding the squad look hopelessly effortless, even winning some friends along the way. To understand the magnitude of what he has accomplished, continue reading!

Before I continue, let me point out that there are two mutually inclusive perspectives of examining this subject. First, a somewhat boring but undeniably imperative financial perspective. Second, what these developments in West London mean to the team from a tactical point of view. For the benefit of the argument, I will cast glances at the financial implications first and then touch upon the tactical viewpoint.

Consider the following transfers concluded during the winter and summer transfer* windows of 2014, as on 27^th July:

*Only those transfers where financial transactions are involved have been represented.

Players Sold:

·         David Luiz (27)                   : £50 million

·         Juan Mata  (26)                   : £37 million

·         Kevin De Bruyne (23)         : £18 million

·         Demba Ba (29)                    : £5 million

·         Patrick van Aanholt (23)      : £1.5 million

Total:                                  : £111.5 million

Players Bought:

·         Diego Costa (25)               : £32 million

·         Cesc Fabregas (27)           : £28 million

·         Nemanja Matic (25)          : £21 million

·         Filipe Luis (29)                  : £16 million

·         Mohammad Salah (22)      : £13 million

·         Kurt Zouma (19)               : £ 12 million

·         Mario Pasalic (19)             : £ 3 million

Total:                                : £124 million

.

So essentially we are looking at a net outlay of £12.5 million over the last two transfer windows during which Mourinho has completely overhauled the squad, addressing all the key issues along the way. To make it look better, Manchester United paid almost three times that amount to acquire the services of a 19 year old continentally untested full-back on earthshattering wages from Southampton - a deal Mourinho himself avoided fearing such a move would “kill” the club. Further, if speculation is to be believed, Chelsea are looking to offload either Fernando Torres (£15 million) or Romelu Lukaku (£25 million), the proceeds from which would not only balance the transfer books but might also result in a net profit – a rare commodity at Chelsea if the last 10 years are anything to go by. And that tells you only half the story.

Chelsea were in the business of signing players who were in the peak of their careers for exorbitant amounts and on handsome salaries, only to lose them as free agents at the end of their contracts (see Bosingwa). Although this strategy resulted in some world class players representing the club like Didier Drogba, Michael Ballack, Claude Makelele, Michael Essien and the likes, it always drew the wrath of opposition supporters who accused Chelsea of ‘buying’ success; which in hindsight seems a perfectly logical assessment. However, the envy of the opposition fans will hardly hurt the club. On the contrary, it will always remind them of their success. Rather, it was their failure to abide by Financial Fair Play that was pushing them towards the UEFA red-zone. Tables have turned. First friend made, Monsieur Platini.

Now they are buying hoards of young, talented players and developing them at their fine Cobham training ground. If they don’t make the cut, they are either loaned for further development (Lucas Piazon) or sold for a profit (de Bruyne). If they make the cut (Eden Hazard) or return from a successful loan (Thibuat Courtois), you double or triple the value. There are of course exceptions (Marko Marin) but these are few and far in between. In any case, you make at least 75% on your investment.

If the numbers above don’t tell you the full story or you have just woken up from coma after few years out, let me tell you: Chelsea robbed PSG with that David Luiz fee. And it was no ordinary heist. It was a meticulously planned rip-off that represented a win-win-win for Chelsea. Supremely talented error-prone brilliantly unpredictable centre-back out, check. 50 million Pounds in the bag, double check. The third victory is in the shape of a threat to other teams to mortgage their stadium before approaching Chelsea for their superstars, of which there will be plenty in supply in the years to come. Triple check. The same can be said about the Juan Mata sale, however it wasn’t as bad. The player was sold for just about the right market price but Manchester United were forced to pay a club record fee and Chelsea did not even flinch for a second while accepting the cheque. Kevin de Bruyne was not wanted by the manager but still fetched him a cool 150% profit on investment (bought for £7 million). All three were bought young and sold for mercurial profits. Demba Ba was sold at a small loss but at 29 and on the fringes, selling for any fee is laudable even for a good player like Demba.

Other players released on free transfers so far: Frank Lampard, Ashley Cole, Samuel Eto’o and Henrique Hilario, some of who were top earners at the club, thereby freeing up the wage bill. As a result Chelsea are surprisingly low on the wage charts today (6^th in world football) whereas they were topping it some years back. Again, just to make an example of it, Luke Shaw at Manchester United is being paid £160,000 (reported) per week, a figure that is more than the combined weekly wages of Cesar Azpilicueta (not more than £80,000) and Filipe Luis (£80,000) who play in the same league and position as the Englishman but are without doubt better that him at this point.

But the real implication of these transfers stretches even further.

Champions League final 2012 Starting XI:

4-2-3-1

Drogba

Bertrand – Mata – Kalou

Mikel – Lampard

Cole – David Luiz – Cahill – Bosingwa

Cech

So what has happened to the Champions League winning team?

Two years later, only Gary Cahill, apart from maybe Petr Cech, from that squad can genuinely stake a claim as a first team player for the forthcoming season (2014-15). With Bertrand agonizingly close to the exit, the only other that remains at the club is John Obi Mikel and for how long? Drogba has re-joined the club but surely only as a fringe player. You’d be forgiven if you concluded you were watching an entirely different team at Stamford Bridge this season.

What the Blues of 2014-15 might look like:

4-3-3

Hazard (Schurrle) – Costa (Torres) – Willian (Salah)

Fabregas (Romeu) – Matic (Mikel) – Oscar (Ramires)

Filipe Luis (Ake) – Terry (Ivanovic) – Cahill (Zouma) – Azpilicueta (Ivanovic)

Courtois (Cech)

Mourinho has not only assembled a truly devastating squad to replace the overachieving batch of 2012, but also a younger and hungrier one. He claims his business in done in the transfer window. Although his words must always be taken with a pinch of salt, the squad itself looks complete. It stinks of quality, top to bottom. One that may not have a Messi or a Ronaldo, but one that has a better balance than even the almighty clubs those two mercurial players represent. The transition period under Mourinho was so smooth it could be mistaken for pedestrian. It is the most discreetly, yet ruthlessly, orchestrated transitions in recent memory and could lay claim as one of the best too.

Jose Mourinho often gets all the attention for the wrong reasons and doesn’t always get the credit he deserves. He remains a deeply polarising figure in world football, one that may inspire awe or abject nausea, mostly depending on what colour you wear. His work, however, is unquestionable. Though one may look at his last two seasons, the only two trophy-less of his distinguished career, and wonder if that ‘special’ touch is waning. That maybe the “little horse” talk was an alibi for depleting competence or, even worse, confidence. But don’t write off the Portuguese just yet. He may not rub you the right way or play the most entertaining brand of football but he has immaculately built a rock solid foundation that could as well prove to be a wending machine for trophies. All that at a cost that is surely a ‘Special One’.